Proper way to run bind9
juhasaarinen at gmail.com
Tue Sep 28 05:13:07 PDT 2004
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT), Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> I think you missed the part of my previous message where I talked about
> how the current system offers the maximum in terms of features and
No, not at all.
> That same man page then defines the behavior for SIGINT and SIGTERM.
> Killing named with a signal in this case is harmless, and should be
> functionally equivalent to 'rndc stop', except in those cases where rndc
> is buggered for some reason.
Yebbut... hows does that justify ignoring the vendor supplied
directions for the software in question? We're supposed to use rndc,
> You might want to follow up with this question on
> freebsd-rc at freebsd.org.
More information about the freebsd-current