EHCI considered harmful?

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Friday, 29. October 2004 10:08, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote:
> > I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for RELENG_5.
> > Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it?
>
> ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based
> USB2 disk enclosure.

Well, if we would take stability and general usefulness (even more so in 
comparison to other USB implementations in mind) as the reference point, we 
would need to disable most of USB. I think enabling ehci in GENERIC would be 
a good idea, especially since there's no loadable module...

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20041029/54db1fea/attachment.bin