5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ?
Jose M Rodriguez
josemi at freebsd.jazztel.es
Tue Oct 5 08:38:39 PDT 2004
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 16:29, David Gilbert wrote:
> >>>>> "Tim" == Tim Kientzle <kientzle at freebsd.org> writes:
> Tim> /stand is largely defunct. It is, I believe, still used to
> Tim> bootstrap the CD-ROM installation, but has no particular purpose
> Tim> after that point.
> I was always confused with sysinstall being in /stand. I always
> understood /stand as executables that ran from the loader. The
> "standalone environment."
Right now, /stand is installed from sysinstall, and used, at last,
With /rescue and /usr/sbin/sysinstall in the tree, sysinstall may be
changed to not install the bootcrunch as /stand.
I think /etc/rc.d/initdiskless may use /rescue/zcat and /rescue/tar
instead of /stand/gzip an /stand/cpio.
More information about the freebsd-current