Status reports - why not regularly?

[Matteo Riondato]

Il Mar, 2004-01-13 alle 15:00, Dag-Erling Smørgrav ha scritto:
> Eric Anderson <anderson at centtech.com> writes:
> > It would be much more efficient if even *some* of the developers that
> > are working on "new-and-cool" features would at least mention it on
> > the -CURRENT list, or even send an email to the person (people?)
> > working on the report.  [...]
> > Josef already agreed to do the markup (the most tedious part of the
> > work) - so now it's just information gathering..
> 
> You must have missed the part of this thread where I said "we tried
> that before, and it didn't work".

That's quite a problem, because how can we inform normal users about new
features that will be included, if developers don't tell "anyobody" they
are working on those features?
-- 
Rionda aka Matteo Riondato
G.U.F.I Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org)
BSD-FAQ-it Main Developer (http://www.gufi.org/~rionda)
GPG key at: http://www.riondabsd.net/riondagpg.asc
Sent from: kaiser.sig11.org running FreeBSD-5.2-CURRENT
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040113/50728e57/attachment.bin