Atomic operations on i386/amd64
dfr at nlsystems.com
Fri Aug 6 01:31:30 PDT 2004
On Friday 06 August 2004 03:30, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:15:32PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > >>Is there any particular reason why atomic_load_acq_*() and
> > >>atomic_store_rel_*() are implemented with CMPXCHG and XCHG
> > >> instead of MOV on i386/amd64 UP?
> Have a look at Linux. They ended up doing a runtime self-modifying
> kernel hack so they could ship generic kernels which used the
> appropriate locking instructions on each x86 family CPU.
I also really like the way the kernel exports a page containing 'the
best syscall sequence' for the current processor.
More information about the freebsd-current