small note to GENERIC for isa dependency

[Roman Kurakin]

Doug White wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
>
>  
>
>>hi!
>>
>>i just noticed that removing 'device isa' with 'device npx' still enabled
>>results in a break of the kernel build.
>>
>>as i did not find any hint in GENERIC or NOTES i was wondering whether i should
>>wrtie a short hint and if so, how it should look like.
>>    
>>
>
>You want to do the same thing for pci?  There's a LOT of stuff that
>depends on that! :)  I don't think that trying to add comments to keep
>people from doing really dumb thing with config files is doing to fix the
>  
>
Ok. If I don't have ISA at all, what is bad in idea to remove it from 
config file?
You may argue that I can do the same if I have no PCI. Yes, you are right.
But ISAless machine are more common nowadays, than PCIless (especially
running current).

rik

>problem.  Theres a reason we have a whole section in the Handbook on
>kernel configuration, and we still have people doing dumb things :)
>
>Also note there is a "don't remove this" comment on npx, which you would
>think keep people from screwing around with it to much.
>
>  
>