UFS file system problem in either stable or current

Maxim Konovalov maxim at macomnet.ru
Sun Nov 2 01:43:53 PST 2003

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, 11:18+0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote:

>  Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current":
> DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs
> DS> support.  If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on
> DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect
> DS> summary data in the superblock.  Presumably only one can be correct.
> DS> I just don't know which to blame.
> Does this require explicit fsck?
> I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier)
> and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab;
> sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1
> claims superblock is bad.

mckusick's answer:


Dan's PR:


Maxim Konovalov, maxim at macomnet.ru, maxim at FreeBSD.org

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list