UFS file system problem in either stable or current

[Maxim Konovalov]

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, 11:18+0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote:

>  Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current":
>
> DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs
> DS> support.  If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on
> DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect
> DS> summary data in the superblock.  Presumably only one can be correct.
> DS> I just don't know which to blame.
>
> Does this require explicit fsck?
> I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier)
> and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab;
> sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1
> claims superblock is bad.

mckusick's answer:

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100639+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current

Dan's PR:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/58373

-- 
Maxim Konovalov, maxim at macomnet.ru, maxim at FreeBSD.org