INET6 in world
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Tue Aug 5 12:01:45 PDT 2003
At 9:37 AM -0700 2003/08/05, David O'Brien wrote:
> Machanism, not policy. I would also like to run with NO_INET6. IPv6
> support has done nothing for me other than cause me problems. I still
> strongly disagree with our ordering of localhost in /etc/hosts. My
> system worked worlds better when I put the IPv4 localhost first.
There is no IPv6 in this house, nor is there likely to be any
time soon. If I can't kill IPv6 from a configuration standpoint,
I'll go ripping out the freakin' code, or I'll use an OS that gives
me the option.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list