INET6 in world

Brad Knowles brad.knowles at skynet.be
Tue Aug 5 12:01:45 PDT 2003


At 9:37 AM -0700 2003/08/05, David O'Brien wrote:

>  Machanism, not policy.  I would also like to run with NO_INET6.  IPv6
>  support has done nothing for me other than cause me problems.  I still
>  strongly disagree with our ordering of localhost in /etc/hosts.  My
>  system worked worlds better when I put the IPv4 localhost first.

	There is no IPv6 in this house, nor is there likely to be any 
time soon.  If I can't kill IPv6 from a configuration standpoint, 
I'll go ripping out the freakin' code, or I'll use an OS that gives 
me the option.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list