FreeBSD Version Release numbers

[Daniel M. Kurry]

Eric Rivas said something like:
> Does anyone else think it's a good idea that 5.1 should have been called
> 5.0.1, then once 5.x goes stable, start with 5.1?  That way we keep
> consistent in that every x.0 version is considered development/test
> release.

Don't we have -CURRENT precisely for channeling development?

dan

> -- 
> Eric Rivas <ericr at sourmilk.net>