make WITH[OUT]_* more useful?

[Warner Losh]

On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:40 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:

> 
> On 01 Apr 2014, at 05:13 , Simon Gerraty <sjg at juniper.net> wrote:
> 
>> # NO_* takes precedence
>> # If both WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are defined, WITHOUT_ wins unless
>> # DOMINANT_* is set to "yes"
>> # Otherwise WITH_* and WITHOUT_* override the default.
>> and
>> MK_* can be pre-set without causing an error.
> ...
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I am a it worried that we are increasing the number of prefixes again rather than reducing it.  I was hoping a while ago that NO_ would die.

That was my plan…

Warner