make WITH[OUT]_* more useful?

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On 01 Apr 2014, at 05:13 , Simon Gerraty <sjg at juniper.net> wrote:

> # NO_* takes precedence
> # If both WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are defined, WITHOUT_ wins unless
> # DOMINANT_* is set to "yes"
> # Otherwise WITH_* and WITHOUT_* override the default.
> and
> MK_* can be pre-set without causing an error.
...
> Thoughts?

I am a it worried that we are increasing the number of prefixes again rather than reducing it.  I was hoping a while ago that NO_ would die.

— 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                             ????????? ??? ??????? ??????:
'??? ??? ???? ??????  ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ????
?????? ?? ????? ????',  ????????? ?????????, "??? ????? ?? ?????", ?.???