Not providing static libraries (libkse/libpthread)
Daniel Eischen
eischen at pcnet1.pcnet.com
Wed Mar 26 19:11:32 PST 2003
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 01:51:39PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > Is there a good reason for providing static libraries for
> > libpthread/libkse? I'd like to not support them to get
> > rid of some hacks to make sure certain symbols are present
> > in the static library case.
>
> That would make static linking threaded applications impossible, no?
Correct. Solaris does not provide static libthread/libpthread.
> While I wouldn't mind seeing the whole system move to being
> dynamically linked, I sure don't feel well about deprecating static
> linking completely. (No threads for static binaries is very close to
> `deprecating completely' to me.)
Yup. That's what I'm advocating.
--
Dan Eischen
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list