www/p5-libapreq2: libtool fix, strip libs, pkg-plist followup, p5-fix
ohauer at gmx.de
Tue Jun 10 18:48:02 UTC 2014
On 2014-06-10 11:49, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Back to my proposed change for www/libapreq2 and this question:
>>> Would it be more useful to make the slave port (p5-libapreq2)
>>> a seperate port depending on the other ?
> Looking at the pkg-plist and Makefile mess: Is it really useful
> to have this master/slave port or should I split and depend on libapreq2 ?
I suspect this port will never win a pretty contest ...
running a short grep over the tree shows there are only two libapreq2 consumers
but eleven p5-libapreq consumers
The line WITH_MODPERL2 is from history where apache13 / mod_perl was also in the tree (WITH_MODPERL) (w.o 2)
Since WITH_MODPERL2 is only defined in libapreq2, p5-libapreq2 it can be replaced without any side effects to reflect p5-libapreq2.
Splitting the port is maybe easier with two pkg-plists.
One part slipped over my last mail and should be fixed in the final commit
More information about the freebsd-apache