amd64 vs x86_64
sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Sat Jan 21 20:30:35 PST 2006
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 04:39:39AM +0100, pfgshield-freebsd at yahoo.com wrote:
> --- Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> ha scritto:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:06:11AM +0100, pfgshield-freebsd at yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I wonder if anyone builds gcc without the port:
> > I build gcc 10 to 20 times a week. This includes
> > both the 4.1 branch and trunk. Configure automatically
> > picks up the architecture.
> Hmm...I extracted the gcc40 port here and it didn't finish the build without
> changing the arch to x86_64. Still it was very strange to find the same lines
> on all the gcc4x ports.
Build it from GCC sources. Don't use the gcc40.
> > > I was building a preliminary g95 port.
> > Have you tried gfortran? It is a part of GCC. I use 4.1
> > (pre-release) gfortran everyday. I routinely build and
> > test gfortran from gcc trunk.
> Yes. I'm in the process of porting Elmer:
> Last week the Elmer developers were recommending g95 and even mentioned that
> gfortran40 (which is the one of the ports tree) was not building Elmer. This
> week they had problems with g95 and now they are recommending gfortran.
Don't use gfortran40. You want at least 4.1 pre-release.
More information about the freebsd-amd64