amd64 as nfs-server
Jason M. Leonard
fuzz at ldc.upenn.edu
Fri Apr 29 16:33:40 PDT 2005
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:27:47 +0000
> Chuck Robey <chuckr at chuckr.org> wrote:
>> Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>>> --On måndag, april 25, 2005 22.53.01 +0200 Claus Guttesen
>>> <kometen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm getting a couple of Dell 2850's with dual EMT64 cpu's @ 2.8 GHz to
>>>> replace our very trusty PIII-nfs-servers. I am accustomed to the
>>>> rock-solid stability of the i386-port of the 5.x-branch and will
>>>> probably put i386 on them. But has anyone used the amd64 coupled with
>>>> PE 2850's as nfs-servers? They have onboard em-interfaces.
>> Well, I don't have the 2850's, but I have a dual amd64 usinmg a Tyan
>> Mobo, and it's quite fast, quite safe. I went and bought a couple of
>> refurbished 145G scsi drives, and linked them up on a raid via vinum,
>> and it's huge, safe, fast, and reliable. Being that it's refurbished,
>> the reliable part needs some watching for, but so far, so good.
> Do you mean vinum or gvinum here? (or is gvinum oficially called vinum
> now??) Could you elaborate on what type of vinum configs you're using?
> I've used it a lot on 4.x, but last I tried it was a long ways from
> being ready for prime time on 5.x. Still had issues with gvinum mirror
> as of early this month. I hear Lukas has been busting a on it though
> so maybe safe to use now??
I have been using gmirror + gstripe (RAID10) to serve /home on a busy
multi-user system/NFS server since 5.3-RELEASE/amd64 with zero problems.
I use the onboard ahd on a Tyan 2882; half of each gmirrored pair is on a
different channel, then gstriped across the pairs.
gmirror A B C D
ahd0 A0 B0 C0 D0
ahd1 A1 B1 C1 D1
Caveat emptor: I have not had any drive failures in this configuration.
More information about the freebsd-amd64