i386 or AMD64?
ceri at submonkey.net
Tue Sep 28 14:24:12 PDT 2004
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 03:47:47PM -0400, Schnoopay wrote:
> I'm soon to be getting an Athlon64 and am debating whether to use the
> i386 or AMD64 versions of FreeBSD. I've been running -CURRENT (well, now
> RELENF_5) since 5.0 DP1 on my current system and don't mind the
> occasional issues that come with doing so. I am curious however what
> will and will not work in the AMD64 port. My main concerns are KDE,
> Mozilla, oggenc and similar desktop apps. I know most ports I use are
> known to be working, and I believe that Linux32 compatability is in a
> testing phase currently, anything else I should know before making the
> move? Is there a web page somewhere that lists what ports are known
> working/not working on AMD64?
None of the JVMs or Scheme ports work on amd64, which is a shame. Other
than that, everything I use is fine (KDE is definitely fine).
It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/attachments/20040928/8c772909/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-amd64