Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For?

Sander Vesik sander.vesik at
Thu Feb 17 12:34:34 PST 2005

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs at> wrote:
> Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify.  Let's
>         - Tell people to move to chat at
>         - Report offenders to postmaster at for blocking.
>         - Request postmaster at appends to list definition:
>             "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go."
>           (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people
>           have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.)

I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example,
discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of
what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example
producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems
or similar.

> -
> Julian Stacey        Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich
> Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam).  Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.

More information about the freebsd-advocacy mailing list