SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.
com, why not...
atkielski.anthony at wanadoo.fr
Mon Feb 14 21:52:03 PST 2005
Erich Dollansky writes:
> I do not understand why it has to be promoted like this at all.
It doesn't _have_ to be, but advocacy is all about promotion.
> FreeBSD itself ist just a plain operating system.
Every operating system has its strengths and weaknesses.
> As long as the programs needed for a certain purpose are in the ports,
> FreeBSD is the choice.
Hardly. It might be possible to get MVS to run on a PDA, but that
doesn't mean that MVS is the choice for a PDA operating system.
More information about the freebsd-advocacy