The only worthwhile logo-related comments so far....
Paul A. Hoadley
paulh at logicsquad.net
Sat Feb 12 22:45:03 PST 2005
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 02:30:59PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:26:48PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> >>No matter what FreeBSD will do, companies will not accept FreeBSD
> >>more as long as this structure stays like this.
> >
> >What makes you draw this conclusion?
>
> My experience with companies here in south-east Asia and in Germany.
>
> If a company did not use FreeBSD anyway, FreeBSD was finally
> block-off with this reasoning.
>
> I never have had to go into the discussion regarding logos or names,
> it was just about the supporting structure behind.
You've snipped a little severely there, and I think this is worth
getting straight. The original context began with a reference to
active committers voting for a core group:
> >Also remember that the community (committers) voted them into
> >"office" to represent and make decisions for us.
>
> Do not get me wrong here. I do not think that this is bad.
>
> I think that this is the reason for the acceptance as it is by
> companies.
>
> No matter what FreeBSD will do, companies will not accept FreeBSD
> more as long as this structure stays like this.
So when you refer to the supporting structure here:
> I never have had to go into the discussion regarding logos or names,
> it was just about the supporting structure behind.
are you really saying that you have had experiences where FreeBSD was
rejected when it became clear that the project was steered by a small
group of developers elected from a larger group of developers? That
is, was the rejection based on a description of the core group concept
specifically, or some larger issue of support?
--
Paul.
w http://logicsquad.net/
h http://paul.hoadley.name/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/attachments/20050213/b7a7d0c1/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-advocacy
mailing list