ACPI support - Freebsd 10 on Sony Vaio VPCCA3C5E
Ian Smith
smithi at nimnet.asn.au
Mon Jul 21 17:40:14 UTC 2014
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:30:23 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2014 03:16:10 Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:26:08 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
> > > On 07/16/2014 01:32, Daniele Mazzotti wrote:
> > >> Hi guys, thanks again for the support, but I am leaving for a
> > >> businesses trip and I will be forced to put this debug thing on hold
> > >> for a while. I will be back on track next week.
> > >
> > > Bah... really wanted to figure out the patch problem. I suspect the
> > > file picked up some corruption somewhere between the email and your
> > > FreeBSD filesystem. Your OS version has the same revision of that
> > > source file as mine, so it should apply cleanly. If you feel like
> > > tinkering with it in your free time, I've posted the patch here:
> > > http://pastebin.com/P0B44u0c
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > > Anthony
> >
> > Either by show raw and save, or by download, the patch has ^M lineends.
> >
> > Interesting, but I can't see atrtc.c being the right sort of place for
> > this, seems way out of scope. Couldn't you include its headers and use
> > functions rtcin() and writertc() from elsewhere in kernel, perhaps a
> > module living in the same hierarchy as acpi_ibm, acpi_asus and such,
> > that one could build and kldload if useful on a certain machine/s?
>
> I disagree, I think this is exactly the right place to do it. The CMOS access
> on x86 boxes is going to be via the RTC, and the folks from Intel even
> indicated that the proper place to put the CMOS region handler is in the
> driver that claims the RTC PNP ID. The only pending question I was aware of
> is that Anthony had asked the Intel guys a question about a return code, but
> that barring that the patch was ready to go into the tree (and should probably
> go in soon so it can make 10.1).
I agree :) Yes, as noted I was well under-researched, was myself out of
scope, and missed the basis of this entirely. I'm glad it's going ahead
despite my distractions ..
cheers, Ian
More information about the freebsd-acpi
mailing list