cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/em LICENSE e1000_80003es2lan.c e1000_80003es2lan.h e1000_82540.c e1000_82541.c e1000_82541.h e1000_82542.c e1000_82543.c e1000_82543.h e1000_82571.c e1000_82571.h e1000_82575.c ...

Dag-Erling Smørgrav des at
Sat Oct 6 12:53:14 PDT 2007

Scott Long <scottl at> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at> writes:
> > We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals
> > on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor
> > and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware.
> Are you implying that Jack has no merit?  That's an unfortunate
> assertion.  What evidence do you have to support that?

It is you who implied rather strongly that Jack is neither more nor less
than an Intel representative.  You spoke of "lecturing a vendor" when
all Erik did was point out or own rules to a *committer*.

> > We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested
> > before being committed, especially to -STABLE.
> I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had
> undergone extensive testing.

I guess you missed the part where his commit broke the tinderbox,
because he clearly did not test the DEVICE_POLLING case.

Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at

More information about the cvs-src mailing list