cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/em LICENSE e1000_80003es2lan.c e1000_80003es2lan.h e1000_82540.c e1000_82541.c e1000_82541.h e1000_82542.c e1000_82543.c e1000_82543.h e1000_82571.c e1000_82571.h e1000_82575.c ...

Scott Long scottl at
Sat Oct 6 07:23:34 PDT 2007

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Scott Long <scottl at> writes:
>>What do you expect to accomplish by lecturing a vendor who has shown
>>very good faith over the years in supporting FreeBSD?  Maybe we should
>>tell Intel to piss off since you obviously know how to support their
>>hardware much better than they do.
> We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals
> on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor
> and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware.

Are you implying that Jack has no merit?  That's an unfortunate
assertion.  What evidence do you have to support that?

> We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested before
> being committed, especially to -STABLE.

I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had
undergone extensive testing.


More information about the cvs-src mailing list