cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 sleep.9
jhb at freebsd.org
Mon Mar 5 15:32:00 UTC 2007
On Monday 05 March 2007 04:36, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > grog 2007-03-04 23:42:58 UTC
> > FreeBSD src repository
> > Modified files:
> > share/man/man9 sleep.9
> > Log:
> > Rearrange function descriptions in more logical order.
> > Be less alarmist about the dangers of abusing wakeup_one().
> How would you feel about language along the lines of:
> Prior to the introduction of wakeup_one(), using a single wait channel
> address was possible as long as all sleepers looped around the sleep call
> re-checking the condition after each wakeup. However, with the addition
> wakeup_one(), combining wait channels for multiple purposes may lead
> to bugs involving lost wakeups, and is strongly discouraged. It is
> recommended that consumers of the sleep(9) programming interface
> follow the convention of using only wait channels associated with memory
> addresses explicitly allocated for this purpose, and not overload or
> the semantics of existing wait channels without careful analysis in order
> avoid potential channel collisions. Programmers may find the cv(9)
> interface easier to use correctly, as it has explicit condition variable
> data structures.
> That way we combine warnings about potential misuse with a recommendation
> the cv(9) API.
How about a far simpler sentence:
Programmers should ensure that wait channels are not used for multiple events.
Unless there is wide misunderstanding of this concept (which there doesn't
seem to be judging from the followups) we shouldn't spend any more length on
the topic than that.
More information about the cvs-src