cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide
article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng article.sgml
trhodes at FreeBSD.org
Fri Aug 22 08:48:57 UTC 2008
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:08:35 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato <hrs at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon at FreeBSD.org> wrote
> in <20080818153942.GH1172 at zaphod.nitro.dk>:
> si> I have no general problem with merging www and doc closer (might be
> si> done while considering moving to svn?) and fully requiring having both
> si> for build of either, but having e.g. www/en as a deep subdir of doc/
> si> seems like a rather bad idea to me.
> si> The web site and and doc/ are rather differnet beast wrt. how you
> si> write content so I see no problem having it in seperate top level
> si> directories.
> I agree with characteristics of www and doc are different from each
> other, but I personally feel there is almost no difference between
> having them in two separated dirs and having them in a dir. The
> reason why I like to have www in a subdir of doc is only for simplify
> the current build complexity due to the separated repos, so I am
> wondering how other people feel for having www in a subdir like
I'm in favor.
More information about the cvs-all