Future of CTM
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.com
Fri Sep 11 14:05:49 UTC 2015
> From: Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org>
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:19:28 -0700
> I have been trying to find an example of somebody who is actually verifying
> signatures before piping the messages to to ctm_rmail. Even the procmailrc
> files that you publish at http://www.berklix.com/jhs/txt/ctms.html don't do
> signature checking. From your own pages:
> # JJLATER add a check for pgp signature, ref.
Thanks to the procmail sample from jvarner, I now apply GPG to all
my incoming CTM streams. Later I may move gpg verify from procmail
to shells, per new comments marked JJLATER in:
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context.
Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars.
Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64.
More information about the ctm-users