Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch
- In reply to: Felix Palmen : "Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 02:10:38 UTC
Good Morning Folks,
I now have lurch built over Poudriere; please see
https://paste.mozilla.org/EcEH1jPw.
I enabled portlint and developer_mode.
How do I push this to freshports?
Is there anything else to do?
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 21:33, Felix Palmen <zirias@freebsd.org> wrote:
> * Michael A. Oshin <micadeyeye@gmail.com> [20220827 20:32]:
> > Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im
> > while libomemo etc remain in the security category.
>
> They make sense in both categories. Maybe you could argue net-im is the
> better choice for the primary category because even in context security,
> you can't use this software for anything other than messaging.
>
> Just two more quick notes on this:
>
> 1. The upstream project name is lurch, not liblurch. Avoid to name the
> port differently, it might be confusing for users (and forces you to
> override variables like DISTNAME, WRKSRC, etc which would be unnecessary
> otherwise). Already renamed in my patches btw.
>
> 2. I didn't look at pidgin-lurch at all.
>
> Cheers, Felix
>
> --
> Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org> {private} felix@palmen-it.de
> -- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de
> {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt
> {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231
>