Re: LLM and file systems (was Re: Porting BeFS to FreeBSD for GSoC2025)

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 20:51:11 -0800
paige@paige.bio wrote:

> Your guess is pretty inaccurate; Anthropic doesn’t provide any guidelines
> for this code and as far as legally what is derived work the law is pretty
> obtuse and and it’s kind of whatever people are in the mood to say;

It's not obtuse, it's perfectly right. Especially when you acknowledge
yourself that it is not *you* who wrote the code but LLM - it will be pretty
easy for any lawyer. So Project can't take such risks.

> there’s no basis of meaningful science behind that and they could take

It is, and it is pretty clear ...

> something that you honestly did write yourself and as long as they can
> convince a jury that you stole it then that’s all that matters.

...because, for human, it is doubtful whether it was stolen or being written
just similar, but for LLM, there is no doubt: it *is* derived from training
dataset, it's just difficult to determine which parts were recombinated.

-- 
WBR, @nuclight