Re: Retiring WITHOUT_CXX
- Reply: Eugene Grosbein : "Re: Retiring WITHOUT_CXX"
- In reply to: Ed Maste : "Retiring WITHOUT_CXX"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:45:23 UTC
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ed Maste <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Several base system components are written in C++, and the WITHOUT_CXX > option is not regularly tested and is often broken. I fixed a number > of WITHOUT_CXX issues in response to Michael Dexter's recent Build > Option Survey runs, but it will break again absent ongoing effort. > This does not seem like a useful endeavour given the limitations it > imposes on the resulting system. > > I'm proposing we remove the WITHOUT_CXX option and have opened a > review to do so: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33108 We've grown enough C++ support this is likely sane. Warner