Re: [Call for testing] New utility: audio(8)

Trenton Schulz wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 14:04 +0200, Christos Margiolis wrote:
> > Opinions on the name? Is better to keep it as audio(8) or rename it
> > to
> > sndctl(8)?
> 
> What about taking inspiration from ifconfig and doing something like
> soundconfig (or audioconfig or sndconfig)?
> 
> Otherwise, as a utility name, audio doesn't really have any "action"
> involved, so something like "control" or "config" is probably a move
> towards a better name.

I renamed it to sndctl(8).

Christos