Re: [Call for testing] New utility: audio(8)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:31 UTC
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 14:04 +0200, Christos Margiolis wrote: > Opinions on the name? Is better to keep it as audio(8) or rename it > to > sndctl(8)? What about taking inspiration from ifconfig and doing something like soundconfig (or audioconfig or sndconfig)? Otherwise, as a utility name, audio doesn't really have any "action" involved, so something like "control" or "config" is probably a move towards a better name. Best regards, -- Trenton