Re: lightdm maintainership

From: Tobias C. Berner <tcberner_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 17:09:44 +0200
Moin moin

In my mind members of xfce_at_ implying you, are members of desktop_at_.
So feel free to assign it to desktop_at_ and simply committing to it :)
I would love to see some more people commit under the desktop_at_ hat.


mfg Tobias

On Sun, 23 May 2021 at 21:53, Guido Falsi via desktop
<desktop_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Recently maintainership for lightdm ports has been put back to the pool
> for personal reasons.
>
> I am keeping the xfce ports updated it is an optional dependency of the
> xfce port and a common choice for a display manager.  In fact it is what
> I usually suggest if asked about it.
>
> I have been thinking of taking maintainership as myself or as xfce_at_ for
> x11/lightdm and x11/lightdm-gtk-greeter since I use them and they are a
> common choice for xfce and I use them.
>
> Before doing this I thought, since I bet they are a common choice for
> other desktop environment users as well, if it would be more appropriate
> to assign them to desktop_at_. Any thought on this?
>
> Also I can't remember rules for implicit approval to desktop_at_maintainer
> ports. Are people from kde_at_ xfce_at_ gnome_at_ (etc.) automatically included?
>
> --
> Guido Falsi <mad_at_madpilot.net>
>
Received on Mon May 24 2021 - 15:09:44 UTC

Original text of this message