Re: Dhcp fixes may be too nitpicky
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp : "Dhcp fixes may be too nitpicky"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:21:07 UTC
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote on 2026-04-30 at 10:08:27: > I have a system her which gets no DHCP lease now: > > 10:05:36.952520 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 929, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 338) > 10.1.18.8.67 > 10.1.18.223.68: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 310, xid 0xc096f202, Flags [none] > Your-IP 10.1.18.223 > Server-IP 172.30.11.200 > Gateway-IP 10.1.18.8 > Client-Ethernet-Address 10:98:36:a6:23:fc > file "\Boot\x64\wdsmgfw.efi" > Vendor-rfc1048 Extensions > Magic Cookie 0x63825363 > DHCP-Message (53), length 1: Offer > Subnet-Mask (1), length 4: 255.255.254.0 > RN (58), length 4: 1800 > RB (59), length 4: 3150 > Lease-Time (51), length 4: 3600 > Server-ID (54), length 4: 172.30.11.200 > Default-Gateway (3), length 4: 10.1.18.1 > Domain-Name (15), length 9: "HTKNT.dk^@" > Domain-Name-Server (6), length 8: 172.30.27.4,172.30.27.5 > Vendor-Option (43), length 7: 243.5.10.50.56.82.2 > > DHCPOFFER from 10.1.18.11 > dhcpoffer: filename contains invalid characters. > packet_to_lease failed. > > I dont know if it is the backslash in "file" or the NUL in Domain-Name This should be addressed by: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D56740 Fabian