Dhcp fixes may be too nitpicky
- Reply: Fabian Keil : "Re: Dhcp fixes may be too nitpicky"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:08:27 UTC
I have a system her which gets no DHCP lease now: 10:05:36.952520 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 929, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 338) 10.1.18.8.67 > 10.1.18.223.68: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 310, xid 0xc096f202, Flags [none] Your-IP 10.1.18.223 Server-IP 172.30.11.200 Gateway-IP 10.1.18.8 Client-Ethernet-Address 10:98:36:a6:23:fc file "\Boot\x64\wdsmgfw.efi" Vendor-rfc1048 Extensions Magic Cookie 0x63825363 DHCP-Message (53), length 1: Offer Subnet-Mask (1), length 4: 255.255.254.0 RN (58), length 4: 1800 RB (59), length 4: 3150 Lease-Time (51), length 4: 3600 Server-ID (54), length 4: 172.30.11.200 Default-Gateway (3), length 4: 10.1.18.1 Domain-Name (15), length 9: "HTKNT.dk^@" Domain-Name-Server (6), length 8: 172.30.27.4,172.30.27.5 Vendor-Option (43), length 7: 243.5.10.50.56.82.2 DHCPOFFER from 10.1.18.11 dhcpoffer: filename contains invalid characters. packet_to_lease failed. I dont know if it is the backslash in "file" or the NUL in Domain-Name -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.