Re: /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and /usr/local/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf (not repo names)
- Reply: Tomoaki AOKI : "Re: /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and /usr/local/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf (not repo names)"
- Reply: Kevin Oberman : "Re: /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and /usr/local/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf (not repo names)"
- In reply to: Tomoaki AOKI : "Re: /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and /usr/local/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf (not repo names)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 17:20:25 UTC
Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> writes: > I think pkg is quite irregular corner case. > Indeed, it SHALL be the part of base, but as it is still under active > developement, need to be in ports "until the spec prolerly fixed up". > So exists /usr/sbin/pkg for bootstrapping. I don't know where you got that idea. It's in ports because it's closely tied to the ports tree and has a different lifecycle than base. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.org