Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 07:06:08 UTC
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:50 AM Alexey Dokuchaev <email@example.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 01:20:05AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:06 AM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:37:42AM +0000, Kyle Evans wrote: > > > > commit 000aad3d093a376bb1104a284b4102149db43155 > > > > > > > > loader: allocate properly aligned buffer for network packet > > > > > > > > Use memalign(4, size) to ensure we have properly aligned buffer. > > > > > > > > (cherry picked from commit 659bf32dfc595b6cd6aeda7f05cb57872c64d2d1) > > > > > > I don't understand, so this is a merge of the commit from master (main) to > > > stablle/12 which had then been reverted? So why do the merge in the first > > > place? > > > > Because commit + revert pairs are noise in the MFC tracker that > > distracts from actual candidates for merging. > > Sounds like MFC tracker should be fixed then, as now it is noise in > the tool (tracker) vs. noise in the branch. Tools come and go, and > code stays forever. > Nah, the tool's fine.