Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword.

Reply: Piotr P. Stefaniak: "Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword."
Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword."
Reply: Gleb Smirnoff : "Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword."
In reply to: Piotr P. Stefaniak: "Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword."
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps_at_selasky.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:21:01 UTC

On 10/7/22 15:21, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote:
> On 2022-10-07 14:03:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 10/7/22 13:48, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote:
>>> On 2022-10-07 11:41:38, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>
>>>>    usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter
>>>> "unsigned" keyword.
>>>
>>> Why? Just because it's shorter?
>>
>> Yes, just because "int" is the redundant.
> 
> Definitely that's true for computers. In case of humans it's debatable.

Would uint32_t be more clear?

--HPS