svn commit: r265187 - in user/dchagin/lemul/sys: amd64/linux amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux

[John Baldwin]

On Friday, May 02, 2014 12:41:19 am Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:13:09PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > 
> > On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:17:45AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >> Re this and the signals changes: Are you sure that these values are 
identical on all linux ABIs? Last time I checked, there was substantial 
variation between arm, x86 and mips for these values.
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > They are all different. I know. We emulate only x86, not arm or mips. So 
what the reason to case about this platform?
> > 
> > The structure of the code is such that the other platforms can be added 
later. These changes make that harder than necessary when you could have move 
them to sys/x86 instead of making them fully MI.
> > 
> > Anyway, just my humble feedback. I suspect we'll get demand to support 
linux/arm64 binaries about this time next year based on the trajectories of 
the arm64 roll out...
> > 
> 
> yes, I ponder about something like sys/compat/linux/x86linux.h, thanks.

I think I would prefer sys/x86/linux to mirror sys/amd64/linux32 and 
sys/i386/linux.  You could put headers and/or .c files in that directory.

-- 
John Baldwin