svn commit: r265187 - in user/dchagin/lemul/sys: amd64/linux amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux

[Chagin Dmitry]

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:13:09PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:17:45AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> Re this and the signals changes: Are you sure that these values are identical on all linux ABIs? Last time I checked, there was substantial variation between arm, x86 and mips for these values.
> >> 
> > 
> > They are all different. I know. We emulate only x86, not arm or mips. So what the reason to case about this platform?
> 
> The structure of the code is such that the other platforms can be added later. These changes make that harder than necessary when you could have move them to sys/x86 instead of making them fully MI.
> 
> Anyway, just my humble feedback. I suspect we'll get demand to support linux/arm64 binaries about this time next year based on the trajectories of the arm64 roll out...
> 

yes, I ponder about something like sys/compat/linux/x86linux.h, thanks.



> Warner
> 
> > 


-- 
Have fun!
chd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-user/attachments/20140502/99b4b4e7/attachment.sig>