Misuse of PORTREVISION (Re: svn commit: r434379 - head/multimedia/x265)

Tue Feb 21 15:52:21 UTC 2017

Le 18/02/2017 à 22:56, Mikhail T. a écrit :
> On 18.02.2017 16:05, Jan Beich wrote:
>> Can you bump PORTREVISION in consumers?
> Just did. But I believe, our usage of PORTREVISION is wrong-headed.

I completely agree. The problem is that portupgrade/portmaster do not
handle shlib bumps and do not force rebuilding depending ports. If you
want to fix those tools to behave in a better way, please do so.

In the mean time, when some shlib version is bumped, all consumers must
have their PORTREVISION bumped.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20170221/6871d01f/attachment.sig>