svn commit: r402813 - head/misc/astrolog

[John Marino]

On 12/2/2015 11:22 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 02.12.2015 13:03, John Marino wrote:
> Well, I am not native English speaker, but even I know difference
> between "can" I use in the commit message and "must" I don't use. In any
> case it is such privilege to meet someone who better knows what I mean,
> despite all my explanations.
> Good luck, excellent mind reader.

For native English speakers, these are weasel words.  We know what you
really meant and it doesn't take a mind reader.  Your skill of English
far exceeds being able to blame this on a language barrier.

Summary:
You make it clear that you think the previous commit should have made
the extra step to fix the port.  I made it clear that I think you
shouldn't have have expectations like that and *DEFINITELY* should not
have documented those thoughts on a commit message that lasts forever.

If that last line wasn't on the commit message, none of this conversion
ever would have happened, and if the unpleasantness means that it won't
happen again, it was worth it.