svn commit: r374476 - in head/x11: . xvt xvt/files

Vanilla Hsu vanilla at fatpipi.com
Sun Dec 21 03:37:25 UTC 2014


on my test, without suid root, utmp have no any records on xvt session.

2014-12-11 0:55 GMT+08:00 C Hutchinson <portmaster at bsdforge.com>:

> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:17:52 +0800 Vanilla Hsu <vanilla at fatpipi.com> wrote
>
> > Need to touch utmp?
> >
> > 2014-12-11 0:14 GMT+08:00 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org>:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:05:46PM +0000, Vanilla I. Shu wrote:
> > > > Author: vanilla
> > > > Date: Wed Dec 10 16:05:45 2014
> > > > New Revision: 374476
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/374476
> > > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r374476/
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > >   Add xvt 3.0.0, xterm replacement supporting color, transparency,
> and
> > > >   more, with less.
> > > >
> > > Why is the xvt binary being installed with a setuid root? that looks
> very
> > > very
> > > wrong to me.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bapt
> > >
> As to root; I performed all the testing while having elevated privileges.
> That's why the log indicates that.
> As to utmp; this (appears?) to be standard procedure. Testing against
> x11/rxvt-devel, x11/rxvt, x11/rxvt-unicode, they all do this as well.
> Didn't test x11/xterm. Are they *all* wrong?
>
> --Chris
>
>
>


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list