svn commit: r374800 - head/Mk/Uses

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 07:43:55PM -0600, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> As a vendor who maintains a forked ports tree, I despise this commit and
> all of the ones below. It makes carrying out customizations very
> difficult. Yes, it doesn't *look* good on the eyes, but reindenting on
> such large files with large history maintained by > 1 person is a sin.
> 
> [ ... lots of commits from bapt@ WRT tabspace: 8 ... ]

Agreed.  I was surprised that there was no discussion on this matter at all.
I know we generally had been relaxing "approve required" policies for many
things, and Mk/bsd.*.mk et al. are "owned" by portmgr@, but I don't think
it implies that any portmgr@ member can just come and make controversial
changes like this to his liking.  Lots of people work with these files, and
they should've been asked.

./danfe