svn commit: r528808 - head/net/nsq

[Gerald Pfeifer]

Hi Mat,

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>>> +PORTREVISION=	2
>>> Why bump PORTREVISION?
>> John, as a bit more color: when a commit solely allows a port to build 
>> that failed to build before, or build where it did not build before (OS 
>> version, architecture,...) we don't usually bump PORTREVISION.
> I do not understand what is so hard with understanding why PORTREVISION
> exists.

was this directed at me, or a general note?

If the former, yes, I could (should) have omitted the word "usually"
since I had "solely" at the beginning of the sentence.  Apart from 
that softness, I don't sense disagreement; is there?

Gerald