svn commit: r417795 - head/security/letskencrypt

[Bernard Spil]

On 2016-07-04 0:27, Jason Unovitch wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:19:20AM +0200, Bernard Spil wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 2016-06-29 23:11, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> > +--On 29 juin 2016 15:04:28 -0600 Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
>> > |> On 29 Jun, 2016, at 14:55, Bernard Spil <brnrd at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > |>
>> > |>
>> > |> +USES=		gmake ssl:libressl tar:tgz
>> > |
>> > | Is USES=ssl:libressl real? It seems like a great idea, but I didn't know
>> > | it was a thing.
>> >
>> > It's about the same as USES=ssl:foobar :-)
>> 
>> Just figured this out as well :D
>> 
>> Luckily it is a no-op, the ports framework just makes it ssl_ARGS 
>> which
>> is not used in Mk/Uses/ssl.mk.
>> 
>> The port takes care of the problem at the bottom of the Makefile
>> 
>> .if empty(SSL_DEFAULT:Mlibressl*)
>> IGNORE= needs LibreSSL to build. set DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=libressl \
>>         and rebuild all ports that depend on openssl
>> .endif
>> 
>> which matches either security/libressl or security/libressl-devel.
>> 
> Can you fix the ssl:libressl then?  It doesn't make much sense to have
> this non-functional line in the port.

Hi All,

Will do!

There's a snafu in the periodic script as well that needs fixing.

I've started re-working the LibreSSL dependency in the makefile to mimic 
the dependencies in Mk/Uses/ssl.mk

BUILD_DEPENDS=  libtls.so:security/libressl
RUN_DEPENDS=    libtls.so:security/libressl

The IGNORE if SSL_DEFAULT is not set to a libressl port is a bit wide, 
wouldn't a nice big fat WARNING do? I intend to add a pkg-message as 
well to notify the user what path he's travelling down.

Bernard.