svn commit: r302434 - head/sysutils/ltrace

[Sofian Brabez]

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:57:26PM +0200, Beat Gätzi wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Sofian Brabez wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 09:45:27PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> On 12 Aug 2012 22:22, "Sofian Brabez" <sbz at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:15:46AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> >>>> Author: crees
> >>>> Date: Sun Aug 12 11:15:46 2012
> >>>> New Revision: 302434
> >>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/302434
> >>>> 
> >>>> Log:
> >>>>  Forced commit to note that this port was formerly available at r278685
> >>>> 
> >>>> Modified:
> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/Makefile
> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/distinfo
> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-descr
> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-plist
> >>>> 
> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/Makefile
> >>>> 
> >> ==============================================================================
> >>>> 
> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/distinfo
> >>>> 
> >> ==============================================================================
> >>>> 
> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-descr
> >>>> 
> >> ==============================================================================
> >>>> 
> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-plist
> >>>> 
> >> ==============================================================================
> >>> 
> >>> Hi think, you refer to the bad revision log, indeed you wouldn't refer to
> >>> r278685 because it's about devel/eboxy deletion.
> >>> 
> >>> Moreorever, please next time, ask approvement to commit in a port you
> >> don't own,
> >>> after all it's the rule !
> >> 
> >> I referred to the last revision where the port was alive.
> >> 
> >> If you objected, perhaps you could have replied to my email.
> >> 
> >> Chris
> > 
> > No objections, I prefer to be inform before that's it.
> > 
> > I'm not reading all emails I recieved, too much spam :)
> > 
> > Could you details, what you did exactly to 'force commit' ? with command as an
> > example for next time to keep history. Thanks !
> 
> This is described in the Subversion primer:
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer
> 
> Please note that usually a forced commit is no longer needed if the port
> has been readded correctly. See the "Readding a removed port" section in
> the primer.
> 
> Beat

Thanks for pointing me that again.

But we have a use case here, it will be cool to check svn history oddity in the
addport script, agreed Crees ? In order to avoid a such situation.

Regards

--
Sofian Brabez