svn commit: r302434 - head/sysutils/ltrace

[Chris Rees]

On 12 August 2012 22:12, Sofian Brabez <sbz at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:57:26PM +0200, Beat Gätzi wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Sofian Brabez wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 09:45:27PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> >> On 12 Aug 2012 22:22, "Sofian Brabez" <sbz at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:15:46AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
>> >>>> Author: crees
>> >>>> Date: Sun Aug 12 11:15:46 2012
>> >>>> New Revision: 302434
>> >>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/302434
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Log:
>> >>>>  Forced commit to note that this port was formerly available at r278685
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified:
>> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/Makefile
>> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/distinfo
>> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-descr
>> >>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-plist
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/Makefile
>> >>>>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/distinfo
>> >>>>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-descr
>> >>>>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-plist
>> >>>>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi think, you refer to the bad revision log, indeed you wouldn't refer to
>> >>> r278685 because it's about devel/eboxy deletion.
>> >>>
>> >>> Moreorever, please next time, ask approvement to commit in a port you
>> >> don't own,
>> >>> after all it's the rule !
>> >>
>> >> I referred to the last revision where the port was alive.
>> >>
>> >> If you objected, perhaps you could have replied to my email.
>> >>
>> >> Chris
>> >
>> > No objections, I prefer to be inform before that's it.
>> >
>> > I'm not reading all emails I recieved, too much spam :)
>> >
>> > Could you details, what you did exactly to 'force commit' ? with command as an
>> > example for next time to keep history. Thanks !
>>
>> This is described in the Subversion primer:
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer
>>
>> Please note that usually a forced commit is no longer needed if the port
>> has been readded correctly. See the "Readding a removed port" section in
>> the primer.
>>
>> Beat
>
> Thanks for pointing me that again.
>
> But we have a use case here, it will be cool to check svn history oddity in the
> addport script, agreed Crees ? In order to avoid a such situation.
>

Exactly.  However, it's not really a trivial task to automate this...
I'm working on it.

Chris