PERFORCE change 144741 for review

[Marcel Moolenaar]

On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:42 AM, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:

> In article <EF89C58B-6C77-4738-8A77-44BD3B655ED5 at mac.com>
> Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt at mac.com> writes:
>
>>> These are wrong.  RSA98-III is based on ns8250 and has extended FIFO
>>> buffer.  So I think that the uart_rsa_class should be added.
>>
>> Oh. In your patch you define it as i8251. I only refactored
>> the code. Also, the ns8250 class already supports extended
>> FIFOs, so we don't need a separate class for that. I'll
>> change it...
>
> No.  My code set sc_class to uart_rsa_class.  It's your mistake.

Ah yes, you're right.

> And then I found another problem in uart_bus_isa.c.  In your code
> non-PnP devices for pc98 cannot probe.  My original code was no
> problem...

Could you be a bit more specific?

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt at mac.com