PERFORCE change 135017 for review

[John Birrell]

http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=135017

Change 135017 by jb at jb_freebsd1 on 2008/02/08 06:38:38

	Move smp_no_rendevous_barrier outside #ifdef SMP. It was
	coded as though that was the expected compile behaviour.
	I now need it to behave that way so that a kernel module
	built without knowledge of whether or not SMP is defined
	in the kernel will still work in both cases.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/dtrace/src/sys/kern/subr_smp.c#10 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/dtrace/src/sys/kern/subr_smp.c#10 (text+ko) ====

@@ -290,14 +290,6 @@
 	return 1;
 }
 
-void
-smp_no_rendevous_barrier(void *dummy)
-{
-#ifdef SMP
-	KASSERT((!smp_started),("smp_no_rendevous called and smp is started"));
-#endif
-}
-
 /*
  * All-CPU rendezvous.  CPUs are signalled, all execute the setup function 
  * (if specified), rendezvous, execute the action function (if specified),
@@ -460,3 +452,11 @@
 		teardown_func(arg);
 }
 #endif /* SMP */
+
+void
+smp_no_rendevous_barrier(void *dummy)
+{
+#ifdef SMP
+	KASSERT((!smp_started),("smp_no_rendevous called and smp is started"));
+#endif
+}