Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

Dennis Olvany <dennisolvany at gmail.com> writes:
> Johnathan Michaels hit on the next point I would like to make and
> that is the distinction between patent and copyright. A method or
> process may be patented, but the factual written procedure of such
> may not be copyrighted. I'll follow up with some examples of the
> types are things that are not copyrightable in a final attempt to
> convey my point.

You are wrong.  The method or process is patentable.  A written
description of the method or process is copyrightable.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no