umass regression

[Hans Petter Selasky]

On Tuesday 27 December 2011 15:04:28 Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> Hi list
> 
> I recently upgraded my amd64 box from 8-STABLE to 9-STABLE. I noticed
> that after the upgrade, two of my umass devices fail to attach.
> 
> The first device is a 4th generation iPod running Rockbox. Under
> 8-STABLE, the iPod's 20GB had drive would show up as /dev/da1. Now, I
> get the following dmesg output and no umass devices:
> 
> ugen1.7: <Rockbox.org> at usbus1
> umass1: <Rockbox.org Rockbox media player, class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00,
> addr 7> on usbus1
> umass1: could not setup required transfers, USB_ERR_NO_PIPE
> device_attach: umass1 attach returned 6
> 
> The second device is a Garmin Dakota 20 running stock Garmin firmware.
> Under 8-STABLE, the Garmin shows up as /dev/da1 and /dev/da2, the first
> representing the device's internal memory, the second its microSD card.
> Under 9-STABLE, I only get /dev/da1 and the following dmesg output:
> 
> ugen1.8: <vendor 0x091e> at usbus1
> umass1: <vendor 0x091e product 0x23c0, class 0/0, rev 1.10/5.09, addr 8>
> on usbus1
> da1 at umass-sim1 bus 1 scbus4 target 0 lun 0
> da1: <Garmin GARMIN Flash 1.00> Removable Direct Access SCSI-5 device
> da1: 1.000MB/s transfers
> da1: 934MB (1912832 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 934C)
> 
> All my other umass devices work just fine, including a USB key that I
> always have plugged in as /dev/da0 and many other USB keys and USB hard
> drives.
> 
> The issue is annoying enough that I am willing to invest time and effort
> into debugging it... but I would like to know where to look. Any ideas?
> I still have my 8-STABLE install around, so I can do some comparisons
> and regression testing.

Hi,

9-stable has not been MFC'ed yet.

Could you try to use a 10-current kernel with 9-stable?

USB code should be the same!

--HPS